Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,196,1125871200"; d="scan'208"; a="2100946:sNHT19022778" Message-ID: <434AE423.6070701@brasse.org> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:58:59 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mattias_Br=E4ndstr=F6m?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: boost, boost_unit_test_framework Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Hello! I want to write some C++ programs that use boost and compile them using cygwin. What is the recomended way of doing this? Usually when I use the boost libraries (on Fedora Core) I would be able to link my program using gcc by providing -lboost_date_time on the command line. With cygwin I can't do that since there is no libboost_date_time.a library insalled. However, these libraries are installed: /usr/lib/libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s-1_33.a* /usr/lib/libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s.a* In my build scripts I would still like to be able to specify -lboost_date_time and not -lboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s. Is it the intention of the maintainer of the cygwin boost package that I should make a symbolic link (ln -s libboost_date_time.a libboost_date_time-gcc-mt-s.a) to the library that I want to use? In my opinion it would be preferable to have one of the different variants of the date library installed as libboost_date_time.a. Is there any special reason why it's done like it is today? Another question regarding the cygwin boost package is why the test libraries are missing? I am curious. =) Regards, Mattias -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/