Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <433D064C.63649975@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:33:00 -0700 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.x: Windows 2003 - no console output References: <200509301113269 DOT SM02408 AT grimace> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Igor Kalders wrote: > That was what I did first, before I started digging. The bash prompt even > doesn't pop up. For your clear view: If I double-click the batch in Windows, > a cms.exe console windows pops up and goes away. So it looks like the > command really gets invoked. But invoking bash by double-clicking > cygwin.bat, is not any different from manually starting cmd.exe and calling > bash. > > Also, adjusting CYGWIN within the batch makes no difference. That does sound extremely frustrating. I see no reason why it shouldn't work based on what you've done. You have to understand that the reason I focused on all the stuff about foreign packages on the system / in the path is because that kind of thing turns out to be the problem very frequently, so it must be eliminated from the equation first. Have you tried the latest snapshot release of the cygwin1.dll? It also might be productive to run strace on something simple (like "id") and post the output to the list (as an attachment, possibly compressed) or on a http: link somewhere. But, if the act of running it under strace causes it to work, then that might not reveal anything. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/