Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:04:34 -0500 From: Brian Ford Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: IP_MULTICAST_IF et. all / Winsock[2] value conflict In-Reply-To: <20050929165053.GU12256@calimero.vinschen.de> Message-ID: References: <20050929165053 DOT GU12256 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 29 11:27, Brian Ford wrote: > > I'm having a problem with IP_MULTICAST_IF not working on Cygwin. While > > investigating, I came across this MS KB article that might describe my > > problem: > > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257460 > > > > IP_MULTICAST_IF can have two values (2 or 9) depending on whether you're > > linking to Winsock 1 or 2. By preprocessing my source and looking in > > /usr/include/cygwin/socket.h, I see we are using the value 2 which means > > it will only work if we link to Winsock 1? > > > > IIRC, Cygwin dynamically loads which ever library is present or version 2 > > if both are available? I assume we are loading version 2 on my system > > given it is WinXP? > > > > I don't understand the Cygwin magic to do this well enough to supply a > > patch. I also don't understand how including Winsock2.h followed by > > Ws2tcpip.h is supposed to allow you to link against either library. > > > > Here's hoping that Corinna or someone else is less confused and can supply > > a fix to either Cygwin or my limited understanding. Thanks. > > There's no easy fix right now. We have to drop all traces of Winsock1 > in Cygwin and change the headers accordingly. Can't we just translate these based on a flag indicating what version we dynamically loaded? > Since you didn't say what problem you had, I assume that IP_MULTICAST_IF > just didn't do what you wanted. Correct. It did not send out the interface I requested. > Did you try to use just the value 9 instead of IP_MULTICAST_IF? Not yet, but I will this afternoon. Thanks. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/