Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: cygblas.dll not found (lapack) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:19:39 -0400 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20050928170023 DOT 334 DOT qmail AT web31505 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes > >(2) lapack makes some other provision for finding cygblas.dll, but it > >isn't working for me. > > This is the right choice. lapack installs /etc/profile.d/lapack.sh, which does > what you want; putting /usr/lib/lapack in your path. > > The default /etc/profile executes all scripts in /etc/profile.d when you log > in. You may need to log out and log back in if your shell was started before > lapack was installed. > > Another possibility is that you are blowing away the default path in your own > .profile, and installing your own - please check on that. Thanks. Yes, I do explicitly set my own PATH in my .bashrc. I guess I'll just add /usr/lib/lapack to it. Is there some reason that lapack can't put cygblas.dll into /usr/bin instead of /usr/lib/lapack? I realize that that probably doesn't agree with the Linux FHS, but it does seem to be standard practice in Cygwin-- I have 116 files named /usr/bin/cyg*.dll on my host. Thanks, Andrew. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/