Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <8540148a05092209455b3df390@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:45:18 -0700 From: William Deegan Reply-To: William Deegan To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19 In-Reply-To: <8540148a0509201112779bccac@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <8540148a0509201112779bccac AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j8MGjrbG029687 > I pulled the 0919, and 0920 snapshots and both don't run .bat files correctly. > > With the 0901 snapshot and with 1.5.18-1, when I run duh.bat (which > contains the following > and is attached), I see: > REM AHA > echo "AHAHAHA" > > With either the 0919, 0920 snapshot I see the following: > > duh.bat: line 1: REM: command not found > AHAHAHA > > Pretty serious bug as this breaks my regression system. > Is this expected? Was it not supposed to work before? > > I've attached the cygcheck.out run when the 0901 snapshot was being used. > The only thing changed with the 0920, or 0919 snapshot is the cygwin1.dll I saw that Christopher F checked in a fix for this on the day I reported it. Did it make it into the 9/22 snapshot? Thanks, Bill -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/