Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-ORBL: [69.105.72.53] Message-ID: <433001A4.3070003@myrealbox.com> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 05:33:40 -0700 From: Tim Prince Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050726 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lapo Luchini CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin on Vista 64-bit References: <432DCD9F DOT 8020509 AT myrealbox DOT com> <20050918205112 DOT GF5555 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <432DD66D DOT 2020708 AT myrealbox DOT com> <432FBB34 DOT 4060103 AT lapo DOT it> In-Reply-To: <432FBB34.4060103@lapo.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lapo Luchini wrote: > Tim Prince wrote: > > >I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such > >software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will > >consider Vista broken. > > > FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64. > (in fact, I used it for a month now) > Yes, considering that modification of the cygwin shortcut is no longer required for the released OS, the problem with Vista was an unpleasant surprise. I'm finding that certain applications require unannounced patches to run on the released X64 OS. Others run fine on Vista if you can figure out how to set them up. Meanwhile, major retailers act like it's a secret their machines run 64-bit OS, offering no options but 32-bit XP home and Pro. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/