Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:40:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug in tcltk's glob Message-ID: <20050916144043.GC12158@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <432A9D86 DOT 5000901 AT epo DOT st> <20050916140112 DOT GA12158 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:22:49PM +0200, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:25:10PM +0200, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: >> >>>sorry for mailing to you directly, but so far no one responded to my >>>'1.5.18: tclsh's glob and relative paths containing ".."' mail on the >>>Cygwin mailing list. Here's a copy: >> >>Please check out the project web page for links to available information >>and ports: http://cygwin.com/ . >> >>If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is >>the best place to make observations or get questions answered. >>Information on the mailing list is available at the project web page. >> >>For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the >>cygwin mailing list. I've also Cc'ed this reply there. > >I'm sorry but I do not see how the information available on the Cygwin >site is able to help me. There is no more recent version of tcltk >available from the ports site than the one that ships with Cygwin, and >that version is from 2003. The email that you are referring to had this return address: cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com and contained the following words: "Btw, this doesn't go without saying, but please don't use the responses from this email as an excuse to contact people directly about the packages they maintain." So, I don't think that you should be too surprised to receive a canned response. >So I tried to find out who maintains the tcltk package for Cygwin, and >that turned out to be you (see your post on cygwin.applications). So I'd >like to kindly ask to if you can privide a never tcltk package which >hopefully solve the bug in glob I currently see. Here's the bug again: FYI, the tcltk package is provided only to support the "insight" debugger. I know nothing about tcltk so I really can't help with problems. If you have a patch for tcltk, please send it to the insight mailing list. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/