Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:50:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release Message-ID: <20050914035013.GB30032@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050912222727 DOT GA24998 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4326CC52 DOT 7030708 AT byu DOT net> <20050913221402 DOT GA24536 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43279C36 DOT 1070405 AT byu DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43279C36.1070405@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:42:46PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >True, 1.5.18 had the same problem, but 1.5.17 did not. So it just depends >on how far back you were looking before calling it a regression :) Does this ring a bell? "If you think you've found an error, please indicate whether this is a regression from 1.5.18." cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/