Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: bentley AT mail DOT bl DOT com
Message-Id: <p06110404bf47ca02e968@[10.0.80.145]>
In-Reply-To: <20050909094647.GT5555@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <p06110402bf458caf1166@[192.168.1.103]>  <20050908075435 DOT GA5555 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <p06110404bf463973bbc6@[192.168.1.103]>  <20050909094647 DOT GT5555 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 16:34:47 -0700
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Michael Brian Bentley <bentley AT crenelle DOT com>
Subject: Re: Logout Terminal Services RDC ends ssh invoked by W2k3 service
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

>You could do me a favour and try the latest Cygwin snapshot 2005-Sep-08
>from http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/ It contains a patch which let
>Cygwin application ignore the LOGOFF event entirely and let the default
>mechanism deal with it.  I'd be interested if it changes the observed
>behaviour.  That's plan B from my point of view.
>
>Corinna
>
>--
>Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Red Hat, Inc.

That change still works. More exercising to follow.

What kind of time does it normally take to get a change like that 
into the vetted release of the dll?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/