Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050831214308.050b59d0@pop.prospeed.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:48:04 -0400
To: Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <lh-no-personal-replies-please AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: xmkmf resuling in bad search path for std includes?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0508302356200.8097-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.  it>
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0508302356200 DOT 8097-100000 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 06:35 PM 8/30/2005, you wrote:

>According to Larry Hall on 8/30/2005:
>
>> According to Thomas Chadwick on 8/30/2005:

<snip>

>>> As I see it, either xmkmf is setting up the wrong search path, or
>>> something is wrong with my gcc installation (since make depend is
>>> looking in 3.3.3/include but the files are located in 3.4.4/include). 
>>
>>
>> Sounds like the latter.  You'll need to get rid of all references to
>> 3.3.3.
>
>
>I have got similar warnings building CERNLIB with g77 and other
>applications that seem to work, i.e. I have ignored these warnings.
>
>With GCC 3.4.4 on cygwin there is no 3.4.4 version for GPC, the Pascal
>compiler, so when one upgrades from 3.3.3 to 3.4.4 in cygwin remains the
>referenfes to gcc 3.3.3 regarding GPC pakages 3.3.3
>(for example /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.3/ which contains
>gpcpp.exe, gpc1.exe, include/ etc.).
>
>>From the mailing list seems that there is some incompatibility between GPC
>3.3.3 and GCC(gcc, g++, g77...) 3.4.4, so that if one should work with
>GPC, one must stay with 3.3.3 and not upgrades to 3.4.4.
>
>
>Does this mean that if one does not use gpc one should unistall GPC 3.3.3
>when upgrading to GCC 3.4.4?


 From looking at the gpc package, I don't see anything in the include 
directory that is likely to cause a problem.  But, if someone has gpc
installed but isn't using it, it would be safer and cleaner to get rid
of the installation regardless of whether gcc 3.3.3 or 3.4.4 is installed.
But that's just my opinion.

--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/