Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <430DB6C6.3020203@vihmapuu.ee> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:17:10 +0300 From: Raul Metsma User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with Windows threads and cygwin sleep() References: <20050824185143 DOT 76C69A01 AT data DOT zone DOT ee> <430D688D DOT 1070205 AT vihmapuu DOT ee> <430D8FC8 DOT 8090906 AT vihmapuu DOT ee> <20050825100234 DOT GL17452 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <430DA017 DOT 5000402 AT vihmapuu DOT ee> <20050825115019 DOT GP17452 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050825120922 DOT GQ17452 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20050825120922.GQ17452@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes > You're on W2K, I'm on XP, maybe there's a difference? I can easily > reproduce nearly 0% CPU with 1000 threads if no Cygwin process is > present and nearly 99% if a Cygwin process is present. I have XP SP2 laptop and it occures on 200 threads Raul Metsma -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/