Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Shankar Unni <shankarunni AT netscape DOT net>
Subject:  Re: Permissions, again
Date:  Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:00:36 -0700
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <dedat4$a45$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <20050819194352 DOT GA28538 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0508191608070 DOT 16057 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20050819202459 DOT GA23900 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0508191653180 DOT 16057 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20050820085926 DOT GS17452 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Thunderbird/1.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7
In-Reply-To: <20050820085926.GS17452@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> use POSIX permissions with POSIX permission rules -> ntsec, 
 > use Windows permissions with Windows permission rules -> nontsec

Err, isn't that sort of a backwards terminology? When I see the word 
"ntsec", I read it as "use NT SECurity", vs. "NO NT SECurity" (i.e. 
something else, e.g. POSIX)..

Perhaps the confusion might be reduced if the option were called 
posixsec or noposixsec..


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/