Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:20:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Permissions on .ssh/id_rsa Message-ID: <20050818202018.GA19261@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050817201613 DOT GA13524 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> <4303DDEB DOT F45A3616 AT dessent DOT net> <20050818134424 DOT GA4219 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> <20050818184816 DOT GA24529 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 18 12:39, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > >On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > > > >>To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without > >>smbntsec. I forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I > >>can't think of a situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec but > >>not honor smbntsec... > > > >When the SMB server doesn't reflect the permissions correctly, > > IMHO then that problem should be corrected. That's a good idea. I'm sure the Samba team will happily consider patches. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/