Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:49:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Andrew DeFaria cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Permissions on .ssh/id_rsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20050817201613 DOT GA13524 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> <4303DDEB DOT F45A3616 AT dessent DOT net> <20050818134424 DOT GA4219 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> <20050818184816 DOT GA24529 AT SDF DOT LONESTAR DOT ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > > > > > To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without smbntsec. I > > > forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I can't think of a > > > situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec but not honor smbntsec... > > > > When the SMB server doesn't reflect the permissions correctly, > > IMHO then that problem should be corrected. Not always possible. > > or when the owner user on the remote end isn't accessible via Windows (e.g., > > mounting a DFS filesystem via SMB). > > How often does that happen? Don't know. It did happen to me, hence my use of nosmbntsec... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/