Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Herb Martin" To: Subject: RE: Another (differently) broken man on CygWin 1.5.8 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:09:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <43001D85.1ABC9E85@dessent.net> Message-ID: X-Sign-LQC: HerbM AT learnquick DOT com/2005-08-15 01:09:49/=etzuoxax > > cygcheck can show a version when the program is not > > even there (either not installed or missing) > > Why do you say that the Cygwin man was not installed? From > everything you've posted it was installed just fine, but your > other version of man was found first in the path. No, it wasnt' THERE. There was no man.exe AND the "other man" was LATER on the path even had there been such a file. I used setup and re-installed it. The other item, still later on the path was being picked up. So I deleted the other man, and then bash complained that the deleted file was missing even though the "right one" is in /usr/bin and the "wrong one" is gone. I still haven't found an encantation for "hash" (or the proper command) so temporarily I put a link in the "wrong location" to point to the correct man.exe. -- Herb Martin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/