Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:12:53 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: findutils vs. /proc/registry Message-ID: <20050812131253.GO2816@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <42F75183 DOT 6010804 AT byu DOT net> <20050808133156 DOT GB14783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050808153351 DOT GE14783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <42FC1729 DOT 2070904 AT byu DOT net> <20050812080136 DOT GL2816 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <42FC9C36 DOT 5000800 AT byu DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42FC9C36.5000800@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 12 06:55, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Corinna Vinschen on 8/12/2005 2:01 AM: > > The Cygwin version is from FreeBSD, which in turn is from OpenBSD. > > > > I saw that coreutils also does not even ask for fts(3) being available > > on the target system, but du(1) is easily patchable, so I used that for > > testing our new fts(). > > That's because coreutils, CVS tar, findutils, and other GNU projects that > use gnulib all inherit gnulib's declaration that no system has yet > provided an fts(3) with enough features. Given that fts() is a BSD invention anyway, that sounds somewhat snotty to me. Unfortunately fts() isn't in SUSv3. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/