Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42FB6AF2.2060301@spirentcom.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:12:50 -0400 X-Sybari-Trust: af80e411 24a46624 0888bd50 0000013d From: Joe Buehler <jbuehler AT spirentcom DOT com> Reply-To: jbuehler AT spirentcom DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rms AT gnu DOT org CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>, emacs_user AT hotmail DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, emacs-devel AT gnu DOT org Subject: Re: is there a cygwin maintainer for gnu emacs? References: <BAY107-F29E79AE5E6EDDEC1D619EBF8BA0 AT phx DOT gbl> <42F9E707 DOT 1030302 AT spirentcom DOT com> <ull39oevh DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <E1E3E1X-0003e9-Kh AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> In-Reply-To: <E1E3E1X-0003e9-Kh@fencepost.gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard M. Stallman wrote: > When GC encounters a fatal inconsistency in the Emacs data structures, > it is generally unsafe to say anything, since that could easily cause > a nested fatal signal. > > It would also not be very useful, since any info we could put into > such an error message could be quickly discovered by a little > investigation with a debugger. I have to disgree with that, it's the instant gut ueber-programmer reaction to such problems. Currently the user just gets an exiting emacs, leaving me with no clue as to why emacs exited. I then have to provide instructions to the user as to how to run the $*&$%#!!! debugger to help me figure out what happened. The debugger that he may or may not have installed, and may or may not even be ABLE to install. A simple last-ditch printf that says "corruption detected during garbage collection, see you later" would be a much easier way to get an initial handle on what the heck the problem is. As it was, without any message, my initial suspicion was a SEGV or similar, which would be much more likely to be a Cygwin problem than an emacs problem. -- Joe Buehler -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/