Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <2ee1c2b305080806533f937040@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:53:11 -0500 From: Weiqi Gao To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe filename In-Reply-To: <20050808045629.GA8474@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Disposition: inline References: <1122420393 DOT 4675 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <20050807104114 DOT 016bdb1d DOT bpriest AT verizon DOT net> <008a01c59bd3$e9117f90$0200000a AT agamemnon> <20050808045629 DOT GA8474 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id j78DrMZw022575 On 8/7/05, Christopher Faylor wrote:> > Just in case it matters, unless Corinna disagrees, we won't be changing> the name to something other than setup.exe. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Stick with setup.exe! There areprobably tens of thousands of little scripts written that doessomething like: wget -c http://cygwin.com/setup.exe && ./setup.exe Changing the name will force all of them to revise the scripts---forno apparent gain! > The notion that changing> the name to something else will make users understand how to use> setup.exe is not one that I adhere to. Whatever you change the name to, there will be people complaining. And remember, the users of Cygwin are those who want to use thingslike tr(1), cat(1), awk(1), gcc(1), or even perl(1). Surely theyunderstand things like the file systems, directory structures, and thenaming of executables. -- Weiqi Gao (¸ßΪÆæ)weiqigao AT gmail DOT comhttp://www.weiqigao.com/blog/