Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Proposed FAQ in DocBook (Attn: tetex maintainer) References: <87vf2l90b6 DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:44:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Igor Pechtchanski's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:36:54 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <878xzh8ulv.fsf@peder.flower> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski writes: > Probably, but a successful build of the Cygwin HTML documentation relies > on texi2html being present. Ah. > It would have been nice to at least announce that texi2html is no > longer packaged, and/or package it separately. I don't see that in > your tetex-3.0.0 announcements. IMO, that's what announcements are > *for*. It wasn't dropped intentionally, as it wasn't even supposed to be in 2.0.x. >> Fwiw, my last tetex-2.0.2-15 mknetrel script also has >> --without-texi2html. > > This seems to contradict > . Indeed. I'm not sure what that means, maybe the --without-texi2html switch was broken in 2.0.x. > To reiterate -- I don't want this e-mail to come off as a demand for > something. It didn't. I'll try building with --with-texi2html, and see if that works. If it's not too much trouble, texi2html will be in the next release. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/