Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42F098D0.8010609@familiehaase.de> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:13:36 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stein Somers CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client References: <42EFA9DC DOT 7030800 AT opnet DOT com> <42EFC5F3 DOT 9080708 AT familiehaase DOT de> <42F09150 DOT 9040702 AT opnet DOT com> In-Reply-To: <42F09150.9040702@opnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Stein Somers wrote: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > >> Do you mean the code compiled on the sane machine, where >> the binary runs ok when compiled with the older binutils, is crashing >> when simply copying the executable to another machine? > > > When copying the executable and dll, yes. That very same pair also > crashes on the previously sane machine after it had its binutils > upgraded. Unfortunately, I was too eager to try the upgrade to note the > version it was upgraded from. The version was quite likely last upgraded > at the end of June (but if gcc 3.4.4.1 wasn't out on cygwin yet then, > that must be wrong). I don't think that the behaviour of an executable depends on which version of binutils is installed. Runtime dependencies are: cygwin1.dll and nothing else. >> Isn't it a cygwin problem then and not an issue which version of gcc >> or binutils >> is used? > > > It would seem like the/some C++ runtime library is part of binutils, the There is no runtime for C++, libstdc++ is static. It is a Cygwin problem when running executables compiled with an older version of cygwin fails. When I use the latest snapshot DLL the testcase crashes too. >> I have not tried to build it with gcc-3.3.3, could someone with this >> version handy build an executable and send it to me, please? > > > I'll do so. Thanks. -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/