Message-Id: <200507280818.j6S8I8Tr014375@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
From: "fergus" <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject: RE: ps -p <pid>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:38:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UoD-Scan-Signature: 4b318eb5bb8baa30a440459bb4e7bb68

> That's not good enough for scripting.

An expectation of complete congruence Unix <> Cygwin seems unrealistically
high to me. I've got a few scripts incorporating a branch as follows

	#! /bin/sh
	if [ -d c:/ ]
	then
	  {Cygwin stuff}
	else
	  {Unix equivalent}
	fi

but the number of such scripts is quite tiny, relatively speaking (about 4
in 100).

Fergus






--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/