Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: What's in it for Redhat?
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:49:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <9bbd279405072604461f18ac87@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <SERRANOdl1eCsgTG9Lb0000071f@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

----Original Message----
>From: Alex Goldman
>Sent: 26 July 2005 12:47

> I'm curious, why did Redhat develop (or sponsor) Cygwin? It makes more
> business sense for Microsoft to do so, and they do have the
> misleadingly named Windows Services for UNIX:
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sfu/productinfo/default.mspx
> 
> (It has NFS client that seems to be missing from Cygwin)


  It's all part of a conspiracy.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/