Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42D94E70.5060905@familiehaase.de> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:14:08 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Duleba CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.18 breaks gcc 2.95 compatibility References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Krzysztof Duleba wrote: > After upgrading my Cygwin to 1.5.18, gcc 2.95 doesn't work anymore. > > The same problem occures with the 20050709 snapshot. Reverting cygwin back > to 1.5.17 makes gcc work again. > > I know that gcc 2.95 is unsupported and was removed from the distribution > due to a severe bug, but could you please try to fix this issue? > > I use the old cygwin gcc 2.95 package. If you don't have it, you can find > it on http://www.duleba.net/gcc-2.95.tar.bz2 (please mind my slow ADSL > upload speed). > > > The following results are from 20050709 snapshot: > > $ cat foo.c > int main(){ > } > > $ gcc-2 --version > 2.95.3-10 > > $ gcc-2 foo.c > gcc-2: Internal compiler error: program cpp0 got fatal signal 11 [...] Your example compiles ok with gcc-3.4.4, so why want you use gcc-2.x? Maybe you can recompile gcc-2.95 if you really must use it? However, gcc-2.95.3 was released 2001 which is about four years ago, it is time to move on! Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/