Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42D8F0E2.3020105@familiehaase.de> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:34:58 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: enable-auto-image-base with libtool not working? References: <42D857E2 DOT 6020609 AT familiehaase DOT de> <42D85D8E DOT 2000207 AT familiehaase DOT de> <42D86681 DOT 7010601 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <42D86681.7010601@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Charles Wilson wrote: > cgf(?) has repeatedly stated that we'l run out of address space > eventually, whether we have some bureaucratic nightmare of a registry > for "approved" DLL base addresses, or toss everything in to the > auto-image-base hopper. I think it was Jason. Even if there are two or three DLLs using the same base address, it should be better than all DLLs using the same base. > I still haven't seen a true "fix" for the issue proposed. Is moving > forward with --enable-auto-image-base as a "policy" the best we can do? I think so. > If so, I'll happily patch libtool to conform, but I think it might be > premature to do so now. What is the default base address used by ld if no base flag is used? I.e. isn't specifying --image-base=0x1000000 redundant because it is the dafault base address? Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/