Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:57:16 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rebaseall (was Re: Perl Win32::Shortcut screws up fork) Message-ID: <20050714195716.GC24167@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050714115552 DOT GB3304 AT tishler DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:12:19PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >----Original Message---- >>From: Jason Tishler >>Sent: 14 July 2005 12:56 > >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:08:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >>>> My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script. >>> >>> Once again, let me point out -- that will not solve the problem. You >>> won't be able to run the script from bash, for obvious reasons. >> >> Understood. > > Out of curiosity, why isn't "exec /bin/sh.exe rebaseall" the solution to >this problem? Because of the way exec works for top-level cygwin processes. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/