Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42D33AD7.65CB2D0E@dessent.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:36:55 -0700 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rebaseall (temporary?) patch References: <20050708044418 DOT GA6431 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050711125847 DOT GC3856 AT tishler DOT net> <20050712021350 DOT GC17886 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050712022240 DOT GE17886 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: -5.9/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End SpamAssassin results X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > >So, anyone who installs rebase will also need to install bash. That > ash > >seems unfortunate to me. It means we can never deprecate ash. Since cygcheck already has capability for reading package file lists (/etc/setup/*.lst.gz) do you think it would be sensible to move the 'rebaseall' logic into cygcheck, so that we don't need a shell? But I suppose that doesn't get around the issue of not being able to run it from a bash CMD prompt as you can currently. Though I guess it could be installed as a shortcut on the startup menu or something. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/