Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <04f101c58598$38ad6ca0$6508a8c0@chimaera>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <048a01c58583$120c1980$6508a8c0 AT chimaera> <42D191CD DOT 3C06F579 AT dessent DOT net>
Subject: Re: rebaseall now not usable because bash now dynamically linked to some   DLLs.
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:42:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Brian Dessent wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>> rebaseall needs no processes to be using cygwin DLLs apart from 
>> cygwin1.dll
>> itself.
>
> Did you not read the lengthy thread on this?  It started roughly here
> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-07/msg00284.html> and ended here
> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-07/msg00319.html>.

I don't read everything, I just skim subject lines usually. "Perl 
Win32::Shortcut screws up fork" didn't really catch my attention.

Granted, there was the final email titled "rebaseall (temporary?) patch" - I 
guess I just missed that one.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/