Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: X-Originating-Email: [arashp AT hotmail DOT com] X-Sender: arashp AT hotmail DOT com From: "Arash Partow" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please try latest snapshot -- pthreads mutex users please note Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 01:36:54 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi Chris, I've done a clean install of cygwin with dll 1.5.18 and also tried snapshots from 2nd, 4th and 5th. Unfortunetly issues relating to threading and memory leaks as described in the following post - still exists: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-06/msg00186.html Regards Arash Partow __________________________________________________ Be one who knows what they don't know, Instead of being one who knows not what they don't know, Thinking they know everything about all things. http://www.partow.net >>We're coming close to a 1.5.18 release. Please try the latest snapshot >>at http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ and help verify that there are no >>regresions against 1.5.17. >> >>I'm particularly interested in hearing if the changes made (at users's >>requests) to the default mutex handling in pthread.h are working >>correctly. Specifically, does this: >> >>Index: include/pthread.h >>=================================================================== >>RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/winsup/cygwin/include/pthread.h,v >>retrieving revision 1.21 >>retrieving revision 1.23 >>diff -u -d -1 -r1.21 -r1.23 >>--- include/pthread.h 2 May 2005 03:50:09 -0000 1.21 >>+++ include/pthread.h 11 Jun 2005 04:56:36 -0000 1.23 >>@@ -55,3 +55,3 @@ >> #define PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL 2 >>-#define PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK >>+#define PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL >> /* this should be too low to ever be a valid address */ >> >>do what was requested? This simple change required a lot of changes in >>the cygwin test suite so I'm not entirely convinced that it was a good >>thing yet. >> >>cgf >> >>-- >>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >>Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/