Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:59:06 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Freeze in perl script after cygwin upgrade 1.5.17 -> 1.5.18 Message-ID: <20050704225906.GB20441@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <42C96709 DOT 9030005 AT scytek DOT de> <20050704174424 DOT GA18735 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050704181057 DOT GA19583 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <42C9B0DC DOT 9010403 AT scytek DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42C9B0DC.9010403@scytek.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 05:57:48PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Stop wasting your precious time complaining about my useless strace. You know, oddly enough, the only mention of "time" in my previous message was to suggest a more economical use of a bug reporter's time -- assuming that the bug reporter was willing to produce a test case which it seemed like you were. I wasn't complaining about my precious time. I was trying to point out why it is more profitable to spend time working on a test case than it is to inspect hundreds of lines of strace output and then take a guess at sending what you think might be appropriate. That was certainly true in this case since, as you pointed out, you just sent the lines from the strace which illustrated that you were running the program which your perl script intended to run. There was no indication of a hang in what you sent, at least as far as I could tell. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/