Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:31:31 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bash 3.0-2 and kill Message-ID: <20050624223131.GA27592@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:38:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > >> I have noted that when one uses >> >> kill -9 >> >> in bash 3.0-2 (test), the command kills the process but also bash (even >> if one uses /bin/kill...). >> >> In bash 2.05b-17 that command kills only the process. >> >> These things happen with >> >> cygwin 1.5.16-1 >> cygwin 1.5.17-1 >> snaps. 20050615 >> snaps. 20050617 >> snaps. 20050621 >> >> (I have listed only the snaps I tried) >> >> Which is the normal behaviour (3.0-2 or 2.05b-17)? > >Unless the refers to the bash process itself, it seems that >the behavior of 3.0-2 is wrong. Not sure if it's a bash bug, or a Cygwin >signal handling bug exposed by bash (the behavior of /bin/kill seems to >point toward the latter). Given that if cygwin was this broken all sorts of other things would be broken as well, this is more likely a problem with bash. Running bash under zsh and trying a few kill -9's I finally got bash to exit with a "segmentation fault", which is more likely to be a problem with bash than with cygwin. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/