Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <1120.192.168.0.12.1119628577.squirrel@mail.morrison.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:56:17 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: /usr/man before /usr/share/man in MANPATH (Attn: man maintainer) From: "John Morrison" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: john AT morrison DOT mine DOT nu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, June 24, 2005 3:41 pm, Igor Pechtchanski said: > Hi, > > Since the FHS mandates that man pages go into /usr/share/man, shouldn't it > precede /usr/man in the MANPATH? I ran into this issue because I had kept > a backup copy of the old rxvt man page (the one with YODLTAGSTART, etc), > and, since it was in /usr/man and the new rxvt man page is in > /usr/share/man, the old backup was found first. My fault I think, /etc/profile also has the wrong order... MANPATH=/usr/local/man:/usr/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/autotool/devel/man:$MANPATH will change to... MANPATH=/usr/local/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/man:/usr/autotool/devel/man:$MANPATH OK? Should /usr/local/man be first and should autotool be last? J. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/