Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42B2EDE4.2DEAD79A@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:36:04 -0700 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: POSIX devices References: <42B2687C DOT 4010601 AT vecernik DOT at> <42B27E6D DOT 53211BED AT dessent DOT net> <20050617141547 DOT GD8532 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: -5.8/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End SpamAssassin results X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > >This, I believe, is an ancient artifact of an old way that the x11 > >packages used to work, and you can remove this mount. > > I don't believe that this mount is optional. /usr/X11RT/lib/X11/fonts > really does need to be mounted in binary mode. I was just basing that on a post I read by Alexander, I have no direct knowledge on the matter: Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/