Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42B1BCCD.3030102@vecernik.at> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:54:21 +0200 From: Oliver Vecernik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 4GB limit on FAT32 References: <42B1A4B1 DOT 1080706 AT vecernik DOT at> <42B1A710 DOT A41B00AE AT dessent DOT net> In-Reply-To: <42B1A710.A41B00AE@dessent.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi Brian, Brian Dessent schrieb: > No. It's a fundamental limit of the FAT filesystem that will never go > away. Certainly nothing in Cygwin will affect it because Cygwin does > not implement any low level filesystem code of its own, it relies on the > windows API for that. I misunderstood a statement in a forum. There seems to be no really platform independant file system without those limitations. There is no write support for NTFS under Linux and ext2/ext3 write support under Windows is also not supported (at least open source). I also had a look at FreeBSD, but the same situation with UFS2. The only possibility is to buy the drivers from Paragon. Oliver. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/