Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:05:26 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin bail-out: cygexpat-0.dll not found Message-ID: <20050616160526.GL10382@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <507826902 AT web DOT de> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050616100004 DOT 03d0bcf0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20050616150856 DOT GD10382 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050616152714 DOT GI10382 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:38:03AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:24:01AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>>On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>>On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:05:21AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: >>>>>At 04:08 AM 6/16/2005, you wrote: >>>>>>>For this type of problem, you'll want to use the "Setup Package Search" >>>>>>>page . >>>>>> >>>>>>Great! This is a great utility. This could maybe be even be integrated >>>>>>in a tool. >>>>> >>>>>True. I guess 'cygcheck' would be a good choice here. >>>> >>>>...and if the mailing list search wasn't so abysmal, you might even >>>>find a request from me for a patch to cygcheck to add that >>>>functionality. >>> >>>If it's ok to make cygcheck depend on wget, see >>>. >> >>Sorry but it's not ok. This should really just be part of cygcheck. > >Cygcheck already calls 'id' in this manner... And 'id' is part of the base installation and if 'id' is missing, cygcheck's functionality is not severely impacted. OTOH, if wget is missing then the proposed functionality would not work at all. I don't want to move wget into the base or make the cygwin DLL rely on it. >This would involve adding http connection capability to cygcheck... Right. It seems like this code could be grabbed from setup.exe if anyone was interested. >>OTOH, how hard would it be to just have cygcheck open up a browser >>window pointing to the correct location? > >Pretty easy, either via cygstart or by replicating the cygstart >ShellExecute logic inside cygcheck... The advantage of the text-only >approach is uniformity with the rest of cygcheck's output. Since it doesn't seem likely that anyone is going to contribute http connection capability to cygcheck, this seemed like a potential compromise. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/