Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:01:00 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ri dumps core Message-ID: <20050612090100.GD6568@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <42A9CD52 DOT 6050407 AT elementcxi DOT com> <20050610173406 DOT GA18885 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <42AA5A48 DOT 5020805 AT elementcxi DOT com> <42AA7EE6 DOT DFE3DC85 AT dessent DOT net> <20050611164209 DOT GA4092 AT tishler DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050611164209.GA4092@tishler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Jun 11 12:42, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:04:22PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > > Steve Kelem wrote: > > > Okay. I ran rebase. Then I get the same problem. > > > > I just noticed that ruby uses .so for the name of its dynamic modules, > > but I think the rebaseall script only looks for .dll. Make a list of > > all the .so files in the ruby package and pass that to rebaseall with > > the -T flag, or modify the rebaseall script to look for files ending > > in .so. I think this could be a bug in the rebaseall script. > > Do others agree? If so, then I will change rebaseall to look for .so > files too. Any other extensions besides .so? I agree and *.so is the only other extension, AFAICS. The next OpenSSL version will bring them, too. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/