Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:49:48 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Making /bin/sh == bash. Has the time come? Message-ID: <20050611084948.GV11065@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050610150729 DOT GA13181 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050610231343 DOT 6A12713C0A7 AT cgf DOT cx> <20050611003817 DOT GB1106 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050611003817.GB1106@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Jun 10 20:38, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:13:31PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >Configuring wxWindows from cvs, on a 3.4GHz P4: > > > >Sh = Ash: > >real 3m55.351s > >user 5m8.610s > >sys 1m53.240s > > > >Sh = Bash: > >real 3m41.850s > >user 5m6.220s > >sys 1m53.426s > > > >Looks like the time has come. > > Wow. I never expected that bash would actually be faster. > > I would appreciate getting a few more benchmarks for other packages. > If this holds out then moving to bash is a no-brainer. Looks like we're just waiting for Eric Blake to return from vacation. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/