Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:38:17 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Making /bin/sh == bash. Has the time come? Message-ID: <20050611003817.GB1106@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20050610150729 DOT GA13181 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050610231343 DOT 6A12713C0A7 AT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050610231343.6A12713C0A7@cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:13:31PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >Configuring wxWindows from cvs, on a 3.4GHz P4: > >Sh = Ash: >real 3m55.351s >user 5m8.610s >sys 1m53.240s > >Sh = Bash: >real 3m41.850s >user 5m6.220s >sys 1m53.426s > >Looks like the time has come. Wow. I never expected that bash would actually be faster. I would appreciate getting a few more benchmarks for other packages. If this holds out then moving to bash is a no-brainer. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/