Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: <20050609155759.GA29880@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20050609155759 DOT GA29880 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Peter Rehley Subject: Re: PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT different for cygwin v.s. linux. Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:51:52 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j59Kq8ZY007464 On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:29:46PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote: >> On Jun 8, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Thomas E. Zerucha wrote: >> >>> I have a problem similar to that of: >>> >>> http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-05/msg01400.html >>> >>> I have an old system that I'm trying to port that uses pthreads, but >>> doesn't set the attribute, and a non-owner thread will destroy the >>> thread in a deallocate routine, but this won't happen (it won't >>> actually destroy the thread). >>> >>> The problem is that (in pthread.h) PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT is .._NORMAL >>> on linux, the system was originally written for. It works but >>> eventually dies when it runs out of threads or mutexes or something >>> since it can't recycle. PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT is .._ERRORCHECK on >>> cygwin. >>> >>> It would be painful to add a whole section to create an attribute >>> structure just to set this to be the same as linux. >> >> If you look at the test case you will see a line that says >> mutex=PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; >> >> This causes the program to use the default (ERRORCHECK) mutex. To get >> a normal mutex, you can use mutex=PTHREAD_NORMAL_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP; >> >> However, in the test case when NORMAL is used, the mutex never gets >> unlocked because the signal SIG_CHLD doesn't get to the parent. > > FWIW, I've changed the default for PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER to > PTHREAD_NORMAL_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP in CVS. Last night I also tried to > implement handling for interrupting mutexes based on Corinna's > explanation of what your patch did. > Shouldn't PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT be PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL? > Both of these changes are in the current snapshot. And the pthread_mutex_lock is still waiting forever...doesn't process the signal. Looking at the code I think that the pthread_mutex::_lock function should be using the cancelable_wait routine in place of the WaitForSingleObject. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > Enjoy, Peter ------------------------------- A Møøse once bit my sister -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/