Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 01:32:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Joel Denny To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.17-1: apache and rebaseall In-Reply-To: <42A62CE5.CF33B7EC@dessent.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Brian Dessent wrote: > > If no one responds then that usually means no one knows the answer. :( Thanks. I was beginning to worry that everyone knew the answers to all my posts and I was being ignored as an idiot. > the actual problem that you are having - the part about cygrunsrv > doesn't matter. Yeah, I didn't think it should, but I was desperate. > The sad fact is that it has been reported before that rebaseall seems to > render the current apache package broken, so I guess you can take solace I've seen the reports. I was hoping there were some further developments. Is there a list somewhere of unresolved issues? Or is that the mailing list's job? > You might try manually rebasing just the module DLLs. > > into the 0x70000000 range. You can use a program like sysinternals > process explorer to see the memory layout of the process and determine This is very helpful advice. I had no clue how to find this information. I'll try that out in my spare time. My employers certainly won't pay for me to spend their time exploring a problem that appears resolved by an old Cygwin DLL. Joel Denny -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/