Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <BAY14-F1784BC294209D40BB32F16D0F90@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-Email: [lukeh-temp-email AT hotmail DOT com]
X-Sender: lukeh-temp-email AT hotmail DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20050604171410.GA32605@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
From: "Luke Hutchinson" <lukeh-temp-email AT hotmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: lrint() incorrect results.
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:27:01 +1000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Is there any particular reason the same inline functions as defined in the 
MinGW header files are not used?  They work correctly, and being inlined, 
are more efficient.

_________________________________________________________________
SEEK: Over 80,000 jobs across all industries at Australia's #1 job site.   
http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/