Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Ralf Habacker To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:57:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D03E04FD3 AT exchange DOT timesys DOT com> <429F7D9D DOT 7020808 AT exmsft DOT com> In-Reply-To: <429F7D9D.7020808@exmsft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506022357.37020.ralf.habacker@freenet.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2005 23:43 schrieb Keith Moore: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > Dropping it altogether would be unfortunate. Providing Win98 support DLLs > > in a separate package is a possibility. There's still the point that CGF > > raised, about there being many more people with the knowledge of Win32 API > > than those with the knowledge of Nt* API. > > Is there anything I can do to help with the Nt* conversion? I've been > using the native NT APIs for about 15 years. I'm not so familiar with > the APIs added in WinXP and 2003, but I'm *very* familiar with the core > API set. There were several attempts and many discussions in the past to speed up the fork implementation but unfortunally without any succes. Maybe using the NT api could help in this area. I found one thread indicating this as possible solution in http://www.osronline.com/lists_archive/ntdev/thread4267.html Ralf > I have recently received my official anoitment from Redhat so I can > officially contribute to Cygwin. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/