Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <429F5738.505@familiehaase.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:00:08 +0200
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sunil <funtoos AT yahoo DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
References: <20050602180440 DOT 39567 DOT qmail AT web31706 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20050602180440.39567.qmail@web31706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Sunil wrote:

> machine 1: 533Mhz, 10GB 5400rpm disk, 384MB RAM, SFU
> on W2K, -> build time for texinfo = 345 seconds.
> machine 2: 2400Mhz, 100GB 7200rpm disk, 768MB RAM,
> cygwin 1.5.17 on WinXP, -> build time for texinfo =
> 334 seconds.

-> 345 seconds vs. 334 seconds

So actually, cygwin is faster than SFU, isn't it?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/