Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <42991EDD.3020407@familiehaase.de> Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 03:46:05 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Serious performance problems (Gerrit/Danny please comment) References: <000b01c563c7$f4456f00$976d65da AT DANNY> <4298F195 DOT 9090600 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20050529000152 DOT GE3094 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20050529000152.GE3094@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Christopher Faylor wrote: >>cgf, your box must be really fast if this lasts half the time than it >>lasts for me and I have already a really fast box;) > > > It's pretty fast. This is my famous "hyperthreading machine" running XP > SP2, 3.0GHZ with 1G of memory. I sometimes think that this new machine > tries harder to obscure cygwin bugs than my old machine did. Mine is just 2.4GHZ, running NT4 ;) Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/