Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:18:18 +0200 From: Stepan Kasal To: Karl Berry Cc: ebb9 AT byu DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-texinfo AT gnu DOT org Subject: Re: Fw: bug in texi2dvi, and hack patch Message-ID: <20050525091818.GD2374@math.cas.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Karl Berry , ebb9 AT byu DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-texinfo AT gnu DOT org References: <42931EFA DOT 4030400 AT byu DOT net> <200505241735 DOT j4OHZcn15871 AT f7 DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505241735.j4OHZcn15871@f7.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Status: Clean Hello, On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:35:38PM -0400, Karl Berry wrote: > if { test -x "$dir/$1" && test -f "$dir/$1"; } || > { test -x "$dir/$1.exe" && test -f "$dir/$1.exe"; }; then > > Stepan, do you have an objection to it? OK, this will be the cleanest solution, after all. I commited this. Moreover, I moved IFS=$saveIFS up. It's a good habit, though it has no consequences here. > This seems sensible. I can't actually test it, since I don't have > either Cygwin or DJPP, but at least it is symmetric. I don't have Cygwin nor DJGPP, nor any sense for responsibility. ;-) Have a nice day, Stepan -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/