Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Envelope-From: karl AT freefriends DOT org
X-Envelope-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:35:38 -0400
Message-Id: <200505241735.j4OHZcn15871@f7.net>
From: karl AT freefriends DOT org (Karl Berry)
To: ebb9 AT byu DOT net
Cc: kasal AT ucw DOT cz, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-texinfo AT gnu DOT org
Subject: Re: Fw: bug in texi2dvi, and hack patch
In-Reply-To: <42931EFA.4030400@byu.net>

    if { test -x "$dir/$1" && test -f "$dir/$1"; } ||
       { test -x "$dir/$1.exe" && test -f "$dir/$1.exe"; }; then

This seems sensible.  I can't actually test it, since I don't have
either Cygwin or DJPP, but at least it is symmetric.

Stepan, do you have an objection to it?

Thanks,
k

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/