Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:41:01 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [patch] several new features for cygrunsrv Message-ID: <20050519224101.GI13760@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <428CE837 DOT C00E288B AT dessent DOT net> <20050519203046 DOT GH2794 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <428D0762 DOT EA6011CC AT dessent DOT net> <20050519214314 DOT GB16283 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050519214314.GB16283@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:43:14PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On May 19 14:38, Brian Dessent wrote: >> Do you think the idea of having cygcheck include the --list --verbose >> output is worthwhile? I'll see to doing that if it's agreeable. > >Definitely. cygcheck mustn't rely on cygrunsrv being available, but if >it is, it's -L -V output is valuable system config information. Big ditto. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/