Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: stow To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 (b106d0fd.130.289) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050517090007 DOT 762DF6D41F6 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4289C0C5 DOT 70103 AT atomice DOT net> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:41:53 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4289C0C5.70103@atomice.net> X-Archive: Yes > Does stow have support for hard links at all? No, not at present. > If not is that an easy > thing to add in? It probably is, although I can't spend any time on it in the foreseeable future. > Such an option would make stow more useful on Cygwin, IMHO. I think you're right, for the following reasons. One, as I said in the announcement, Cygwin implements symlinks as Windows shortcuts, which are broken. Therefore, stow will only be useful for installing software that is used exclusively within Cygwin (which interprets the shortcuts to emulate POSIX behavior) and that doesn't install any DLLs (since Windows won't interpret the symlinks correctly). Two, Cygwin implements hard links as file copies. Windows file systems don't support hard links, so this is probably the best that can be done. So 'ln a b' is really the same as 'cp -p a b'. Now that approach has obvious disadvantages (it uses twice the disk space; changes in either file aren't reflected in the other, since they're different files), but for software installation it would have the advantage of solving the symlink problem. Installed files (including DLLs) would just be copied into the installation directory, where Windows can use them. The original, stowed copy (e.g. /usr/local/stow/emacs) would become superfluous, except as a map of which files to delete if you want to uninstall the package. Also, the problem of modifications to the target not being reflected in the source probably isn't very important for software installation, since the package files don't get changed much. So, if someone wanted to pursue this, I think it would be useful. Andrew. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/