Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:03:07 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated: tetex-3.0.0-3 - now missing texi2html which is *mandatory*   for Cygwin DLL build
Message-ID: <20050512050307.GA2298@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20050512033545 DOT GD25511 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4282D5D2 DOT 6090903 AT msa DOT hinet DOT net> <4282DA3D DOT 9020607 AT msa DOT hinet DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4282DA3D.9020607@msa.hinet.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:23:25PM +0800, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>Allow me to correct myself before someone else does.
>
>Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>>My interpretation is drawn from the fact that the default make target
>>does make a call to texi2html, and therefore will fail.
>
>I am doubly wrong :-(, because it will/does not fail.  The exit status
>of the texi2html call is ignored.
>
>...  also, I spelt moot wrong in the original post.
>
>I am a little embarrassed by this foray into the Cygwin mailing list
>:-(, hopefully I can make up for it in the future with positive
>contributions.

No need to beat yourself up.  Although I've had a run of misreading of
email lately both here and (more embarrassingly) with customers at work,
so I know how you feel.

We all make mistaks.  It's how we lern.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/