Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <cb51e2e050511215056dfe0ff@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:50:09 -0700
From: Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated: tetex-3.0.0-3 - now missing texi2html which is *mandatory* for Cygwin DLL build
In-Reply-To: <20050512033545.GD25511@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4281C5F1 DOT 8000900 AT msa DOT hinet DOT net> <4282C712 DOT 7040003 AT msa DOT hinet DOT net> 	 <20050512033545 DOT GD25511 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j4C4oIbX028501

On 5/11/05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:01:38AM +0800, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >> It seems that texi2html has dropped out/moved out of the binary package.
> >> Is this deliberate? Where should I look for it now?
> >
> >Sorry if this seems like impatience, but I am not sure I captured the
> >severity of this problem in my original email... and since response has
> >been a little mute, I may have been at fault.
> >
> >The Cygwin DLL build has a dependency on texi2html, which was available
> >as recently in tetex-bin-2.0.2-15.
> 
> The Cygwin DLL build does NOT have a dependency on texi2html.  The Cygwin
> documentation directory does have such a dependency but I don't see why
> this is a severe problem.


There is also a copy of texi2html in the cygwin-doc src package
because I've tried to
keep the look constant whether I actually build the package on cygwin,
debian, or fedora.
By the way, all documentation build failures are silently ignored.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/