Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:55:17 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Static destructors not running Message-ID: <20050511215517.GA25511@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <48781a66050509154660edcc78 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <48781a6605051006066aa9b036 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20050510153512 DOT GZ15665 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <48781a66050510085450bd1339 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20050510160904 DOT GF15665 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <48781a66050511040119156dc9 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48781a66050511040119156dc9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:01:07AM -0400, William M. (Mike) Miller wrote: >The order of destruction of static objects should be the inverse of >their order of construction, regardless of whether they are global or >local. In 1.5.16 and the latest snapshot, global static objects are >destroyed before local static objects, regardless of the order of >construction. This should be fixed in the next snapshot. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/